<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Recovering Academic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tochangeit.com/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tochangeit.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:38:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The American Dream? by John Halbert</title>
		<link>http://tochangeit.com/blog/2011/06/09/the-american-dream/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>John Halbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tochangeit.com/blog/?p=33#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm. Interesting stuff. You really do sound like a recovering academic. I consider myself almost a fully recovered academic. One of the best things, for me, about majoring in philosophy was getting about as deep into social/political thot (I spell it that way to take the &quot;ugh&quot; out) as possible, and realizing that there just wasn&#039;t much there, particularly as a guide to how to live my life. I realize that there is a purpose to engaging in philosophical discourse - the Founding Parents would have been lost without the Enlightenment. But it&#039;s not for me. 

Insofar as I am interested in articulating a vision of how our society is transforming, I actually look to physics. I think we are making a transition from an understanding of how society works based on Newtonian mechanics - very orderly, understandable, like clockwork - to a relativistic one, i.e. characterized by uncertainty and probability, rather than certainty and stability. As a senior at Swarthmore, I wrote a paper for Phil Weinstein&#039;s Modern Comp Lit seminar about how Joyce, in Ulysses, achieved in literature what Einstein achieved in physics. Einstein understood that space and time were part of a continuum - Joyce understood the same thing about form and content. 

The best articulation that I have encountered to translate relativistic mechanics into an understanding of how society works is complexity theory. Unfortunately, I also haven&#039;t seen much really interesting work being done there yet, and I also haven&#039;t seen much expression of it in popular culture. or at least the intelligentsia. 

I also think we are making a transition from two-dimensional thinking to three-dimensional thinking (and I don&#039;t mean 3D movies), but I REALLY haven&#039;t seen anything about that. 

And, of course, it would be all but impossible to translate any of this into any kind of a politically useful soundbite. But I also don&#039;t worry about that, because Barack Obama is president, he&#039;s doing a good job, and lots of good things are happening in politics right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm. Interesting stuff. You really do sound like a recovering academic. I consider myself almost a fully recovered academic. One of the best things, for me, about majoring in philosophy was getting about as deep into social/political thot (I spell it that way to take the &#8220;ugh&#8221; out) as possible, and realizing that there just wasn&#8217;t much there, particularly as a guide to how to live my life. I realize that there is a purpose to engaging in philosophical discourse &#8211; the Founding Parents would have been lost without the Enlightenment. But it&#8217;s not for me. </p>
<p>Insofar as I am interested in articulating a vision of how our society is transforming, I actually look to physics. I think we are making a transition from an understanding of how society works based on Newtonian mechanics &#8211; very orderly, understandable, like clockwork &#8211; to a relativistic one, i.e. characterized by uncertainty and probability, rather than certainty and stability. As a senior at Swarthmore, I wrote a paper for Phil Weinstein&#8217;s Modern Comp Lit seminar about how Joyce, in Ulysses, achieved in literature what Einstein achieved in physics. Einstein understood that space and time were part of a continuum &#8211; Joyce understood the same thing about form and content. </p>
<p>The best articulation that I have encountered to translate relativistic mechanics into an understanding of how society works is complexity theory. Unfortunately, I also haven&#8217;t seen much really interesting work being done there yet, and I also haven&#8217;t seen much expression of it in popular culture. or at least the intelligentsia. </p>
<p>I also think we are making a transition from two-dimensional thinking to three-dimensional thinking (and I don&#8217;t mean 3D movies), but I REALLY haven&#8217;t seen anything about that. </p>
<p>And, of course, it would be all but impossible to translate any of this into any kind of a politically useful soundbite. But I also don&#8217;t worry about that, because Barack Obama is president, he&#8217;s doing a good job, and lots of good things are happening in politics right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Places by Daniel Tamm</title>
		<link>http://tochangeit.com/blog/2011/06/17/great-places/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tamm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 06:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tochangeit.com/blog/?p=41#comment-2</guid>
		<description>This is part of it, yeah. But for the meta-narrative I&#039;m looking towards Democratic Socialism (www.dsausa.org). They are a simple source of coherent principles.

Glad you&#039;re writing, Andy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is part of it, yeah. But for the meta-narrative I&#8217;m looking towards Democratic Socialism (www.dsausa.org). They are a simple source of coherent principles.</p>
<p>Glad you&#8217;re writing, Andy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.496 seconds -->

